3 ms·
No one would hire him today. Companies are risk averse, given the current economic/political climate. If you can't produce and "fit in", don't bother submitti
by mathogre 14y ago
No one would hire him today. Companies are risk averse, given the current economic/political climate. If you can't produce and "fit in", don't bother submitting your resumé.
- wyclif 14y agoIt's possible that nobody would hire an unknown Steve Jobs now, but it really doesn't matter. Jobs wasn't an employee, he was a founder. Founders don't have to concern themselves with getting hired.
- mikecane 14y ago>>>Founders don't have to concern themselves with getting hired. But they still have to do things like pay rent, buy food, buy clothes, buy tech. Those things take money. And money is usually gotten from a job. The point is, Jobs wouldn't have even been able to get a job to survive first. That old guy sweeping floors in McDonald's today? Did you ever stop to think what led him there? (For the Rand worshipers out there, how was Galt employed at Taggart Transcontinental?)
- wyclif 14y agoThat's a nice way to strawman what I said, but I was talking about hiring, not buying stuff, income, or money. Here's the thing: Steve Jobs did not have to get hired, in the employee sense, because he founded his own company.
- mikecane 14y agoSure he needed to get hired. Otherwise he wouldn't have sought any job to begin with. Strawman, my foot!
- talmand 14y agoI don't see it necessarily as a strawman since it is essentially true, as he did have jobs leading up to Apple. Keep in mind that he founded his company with funding, it's not as if he founded the company and was instantly making enough money to survive with. One could make the argument that even a founder is "hired" when he requires somebody else's money to make it happen.
- wavefunction 14y agoWhat CAN'T "Founders" do? Interesting seeing the egos on display.