Great analysis. The selection does seem random, considering all the "winning" entries that were clearly making fun of Google Glass or the contest itself. There

Great analysis. The selection does seem random, considering all the "winning" entries that were clearly making fun of Google Glass or the contest itself. There were some blank winning entries too (just the hashtag, with no explanation). Which is disappointing, because Google was making it sound as though they would actually read people's entries, and pick ideas: "We have been overwhelmed, entertained and inspired by your responses." I also did some analysis of the original contest entries, now trying to think of a good way to visualize all of them. You can see my early N-grams here: http://blog.itrendcorporation.com/2013/03/12/revisiting-googles-ifihadglass-contest-what-do-people-want-to-do-with-glass/ http://blog.itrendcorporation.com/2013/03/12/revisiting-goog...