3 ms·

Weren't you claiming earlier: "I'm offering you a communication channel to studio executives right now." https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5458900 https

by kefka 14y ago

Weren't you claiming earlier: "I'm offering you a communication channel to studio executives right now." https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5458900 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5458900 And you say stuff like you do not have a right to fly? Too bad there's no way to have HN not show me any of your replies (without scripting).

anigbrowl 14y ago
I fail to see what my professional and personal friendship with people in the movie industry has to do with my opinions on the legalities of flying. Too bad there's no way to have HN not show me any of your replies (without scripting). Well, you could put a paper bag over your head when you see one coming.
- zapdrive 14y ago
  > I fail to see what my professional and personal friendship with people in the movie industry has to do with my opinions on the legalities of flying. Both of these advocate taking away rights from the citizens, the rights for which we have paid a heave price.
  - anigbrowl 14y ago
    No they don't.
    - zapdrive 14y ago
      Yes they do.
- ynniv 14y ago
  Your comment history suggests that you are a crusader: willing to take great risks defending those whom you identify with, but uninterested in defending a disabled mute's right to participate in our modern society. Your arguments, however well constructed, are built on a self-serving foundation.
  - anigbrowl 14y ago
    On the contrary, I said what I think would be an effective challenge to the TSA above. Shooting yourself in the foot (argumentatively, by unilaterally declaring the entire government to be illegitimate on spurious grounds) and then hopping about saying 'look what you made me do!' is not an effective way of changing things.
  - tptacek 14y ago
    What the hell does this even mean? What's wrong with you? In what parallel universe is it civil for you to take a disagreement about the law with someone you don't know on a message board and parlay it into a claim that they don't care about "disabled mute's rights to participate in our society"?

by kefka 14y ago

anigbrowl 14y ago

I fail to see what my professional and personal friendship with people in the movie industry has to do with my opinions on the legalities of flying. Too bad there's no way to have HN not show me any of your replies (without scripting). Well, you could put a paper bag over your head when you see one coming.

zapdrive 14y ago
> I fail to see what my professional and personal friendship with people in the movie industry has to do with my opinions on the legalities of flying. Both of these advocate taking away rights from the citizens, the rights for which we have paid a heave price.
- anigbrowl 14y ago
  No they don't.
  - zapdrive 14y ago
    Yes they do.
ynniv 14y ago
Your comment history suggests that you are a crusader: willing to take great risks defending those whom you identify with, but uninterested in defending a disabled mute's right to participate in our modern society. Your arguments, however well constructed, are built on a self-serving foundation.
- anigbrowl 14y ago
  On the contrary, I said what I think would be an effective challenge to the TSA above. Shooting yourself in the foot (argumentatively, by unilaterally declaring the entire government to be illegitimate on spurious grounds) and then hopping about saying 'look what you made me do!' is not an effective way of changing things.
- tptacek 14y ago
  What the hell does this even mean? What's wrong with you? In what parallel universe is it civil for you to take a disagreement about the law with someone you don't know on a message board and parlay it into a claim that they don't care about "disabled mute's rights to participate in our society"?