3 ms·
-> Most of the channels were educational or news or other special interest... There was a lot of news and special interest but throwing Educational programming
by inkaudio 14y ago
-> Most of the channels were educational or news or other special interest...
There was a lot of news and special interest but throwing Educational
programming into the mix is not factually correct.
I have two list, one from 2011 and one recent. Both show an emphasis on Entertainment and Extracurricular programming.
Recent:
http://www.youtube.com/yt/advertise/original-channels.html http://www.youtube.com/yt/advertise/original-channels.html
From 2011:
http://www.tubefilter.com/2011/10/28/youtube-original-channels/ http://www.tubefilter.com/2011/10/28/youtube-original-channe...
Not too many pure educational programming plays. Certainly not the majority.
->Non-talent costs really can be dramatically reduced in a non-union world...
Producing content is like anything else you have to make, a lot of times you get what you pay. I've worked with a lot of new workers, the good ones rise
to professional level pretty fast and they won't work for equity/portfolio for too long. I think Youtube has gone as far as it can go with cheap content, which is pretty good. Now they are experimenting.
- rdl 14y agoAh, great list. I would consider a lot of the science/food/tech/automotive stuff as "educational entertainment" to the extent that the Hitler Channel and other cable tv programming is educational. But there is not a single thing there I'd personally watch. (The only YouTube content I love, personally, is Hickok45, MrColionNoir, etc., and cat videos. I'd love curated high quality cat videos. I'll probably get some cats and a 4K RED or Canon just to have an excuse to produce this.)