4 ms·

Im not sure if your comment was meant to be satirical, but you just pointed out the big danger in the impending move to wireless connections. > the idea of buy

Im not sure if your comment was meant to be satirical, but you just pointed out the big danger in the impending move to wireless connections. > the idea of buying a particular computer because it has a bit of copper that mates with your particular display will be humorously antiquated Is the next stage going to be everything playing nicely with eachother as it should, or are we going to get a range of proprietary wireless standards that won't work with each other in the name of squeezing a few more dollars out of users?

Cushman 14y ago
Assuming you meant this to me? See my other comment about architectures. What you're describing sounds like Macintosh with PowerPC; was it ever an advantage? Maybe, but then it became a liability, and they switched. It hasn't exactly gone bad. I'm sure there will be growing pains, but users will place such a high premium on systems that work together that it will have to happen at a software level even if there's differing technology under the hood.