4 ms·

One of the things about emacs is its on almost every machine you can find accessible by terminal. Except when its not, which is why I know enough vi commands

One of the things about emacs is its on almost every machine you can find accessible by terminal. Except when its not, which is why I know enough vi commands to do really simple things. (vi seems to be on every *nix machine without fail). I'll fully admit that the configuration and lisp scripts are confusing in emacs. Its almost too configurable. But they are amazingly powerful. Plus emacs has the indispensable (M-x tetris)... I've looked at Sublime, its a beautiful editor though. It seems to have some good tricks up its sleave as well

gknoy 14y ago
Even when it's not available, if vi is available chances are you can ask the administrator nicely to install emacs through a package manager. I just wish it were easier to use it on my local machine in a terminal but still maintain a GUI version as well.
- zwass 14y ago
  > I just wish it were easier to use it on my local machine in a terminal but still maintain a GUI version as well. Emacs? I use a nice GUI build from http://emacsformacosx.com/ http://emacsformacosx.com/. It runs great in both the GUI and shell.
- __david__ 14y ago
  emacs -nw
claudius 14y ago
> (vi seems to be on every *nix machine without fail). I tend to uninstall vi and install ed on my machines, it is just enough and about 90% smaller! :)
- cmpitg 14y ago
  TRAMP & eshell would help you achieve 100% your local Emacs productivity on remote machines, and 100% smaller (you actually don't need to install anything on remote machine) :-)
  - claudius 14y ago
    Emacs is there, too, of course, ed is just for the guys who complain that they want vi :-)