5 ms·

This might sound bad but... I cannot actually see a problem with #2, it would be my preferred solution. When I go to trade shows / conferences it is to talk to

This might sound bad but... I cannot actually see a problem with #2, it would be my preferred solution. When I go to trade shows / conferences it is to talk to brains, not bodies, the sex of the brain is immaterial to me. To me, making sure the bodies are 50% equal in gender means nothing if 80% of the female bodies are only there to make up a body quota but have no interest / knowledge of what is going on. Maybe change it slightly so that the rules state anyone at the booth must be a full-time employee or a contract employee with X months at the company. Could you go into a bit more detail about your reasoning for #2 not being suitable? [EDIT] Messed up my percentages

cdtwigg 14y ago
Why assume that anyone who isn't deeply expert in the technical details of a product isn't a full-time employee of the company? Many companies hire sales/marketing people of both genders that may have a relatively superficial understanding of the inner details but are more enthusiastic and outgoing than the engineering staff.
- pekk 14y ago
  If I go to a technical conference, I am not interested in talking to sales and marketing people of any gender or dimensions. That is something which the sales and marketing people want, not something I want.
- rurounijones 14y ago
  With the idea I stated above there is nothing stopping sales / marketing people from going. While they may not be techies per se I expect them to be knowledgeable out their products. My proposal is purely to get rid of the "Pretty face, no knowledge, hired solely for the event" style of "booth-babe". Of course companies could hire people for the require X months but I am hoping the monetary aspects of that would discourage them. Also, enforcing the proposal would be tricky I think.