That clinical term would be narcissistic personality disorder: he's more concerned with appearances (doing what investors say) than outcomes (does he actually w

That clinical term would be narcissistic personality disorder: he's more concerned with appearances (doing what investors say) than outcomes (does he actually want to do it). That is: the reality of what he does matters oh-so-much less than what other people think of it. Do you think this guy would publicly admit to having sex with another guy if he couldn't disclaim responsibility to his investors? But hold on: >A reminder for others: shareholders don't dictate what's tabled. We can only vote on what's proposed, the implication being that K5M is fine with either outcome. His friend's words. Here's Wired: "Feeling the weight of investor expectations, Merrill spent a drunken night “fooling around” with him. " Note that I'm not saying he's bisexual; I'm not a mind-reader. I'm just pointing out the obvious difference between who made the decision in the story and who made it in reality. So everyone is wondering how this will end, here's your answer: http://thelastpsychiatrist.com/2009/04/the_near_death_of_a_salesman.html http://thelastpsychiatrist.com/2009/04/the_near_death_of_a_s...