3 ms·
You misunderstand the problem. It's not the loss of the $20 of goods or whatever that are lost. Obviously they can absorb that. It's the lawsuits due to the em
by ebbv 14y ago
You misunderstand the problem. It's not the loss of the $20 of goods or whatever that are lost. Obviously they can absorb that.
It's the lawsuits due to the emotional/physical trauma of being robbed while delivering for Wal-Mart.
- largesse 14y agoThere's that, but I'm sure they'd have lawyers work out some sort of indemnification. The first media reports would need careful PR handling. I see this as something similar to what AirBnB went through. It's not unprecedented.
- ebbv 14y agoAirBnB is miniscule compared to Wal-Mart, though. Not even a blip. The ambulance chasers would be all over this. Not to mention widespread fraud. It's just a dumb idea.