If anything Valve as a development studio has a notorious 'policy' of delivering product 'when it's done' (aka Valve Time) as opposed to MSFT product that are r

If anything Valve as a development studio has a notorious 'policy' of delivering product 'when it's done' (aka Valve Time) as opposed to MSFT product that are released periodically and that need numerous minor AND major patches with each and every enumeration. Based on that: How would Steam be integrated into MSFT corporate culture, without being killed? That might be the same question Newell is asking himself, in this scenario.