I'm all for internet freedom, and I have no objection to whatever information cyberbunker may be hosting. I agree that they provide a valuable service. I dread

I'm all for internet freedom, and I have no objection to whatever information cyberbunker may be hosting. I agree that they provide a valuable service. I dread the sterile showroom that some wish the internet to become. But at the same time, there's a difference between objectionable content being available on the internet to those looking for it, and people flooding communication channels with unsolicited and possibly objectionable content, in the hope of making a quick buck. I support pull-freedom, not push-freedom. The recipient should be the one deciding what they do and don't want to read/be exposed to. Would you support someone DDoSing the maintainers of the EasyList for AdBlockPlus because their ad-serving domain was added to it? If SpamHaus had the power to remove CyberBunker from the internet, this would be a different story, and I'd support CyberBunker. But SpamHaus only says "There's lots of spam originating from there". Which is a fact. I don't think they should be punished for stating the truth. A list of suspected spammers has just as much of a place on the free internet as the w4r3z and pr0n we all love so much.