2 ms·
Aside from the poor title choice, I find it hard to discount that angular encourages invalid html. Work arounds aside, it says a lot about the framework mentali
by taproot 14y ago
Aside from the poor title choice, I find it hard to discount that angular encourages invalid html. Work arounds aside, it says a lot about the framework mentality.
I should probably note that in general I dislike the ideas put forward by angular, knockout, and similar. Binding logic to your view or in other words tight model/view coupling is just a stupid idea in the first place, it is quite plainly analogous to inline scripting like binding click events with onclick albeit in a slightly tidier way.
These frameworks basically undo the last decade or so of separating logic from presentation.
Feel free to discount / argue my point, I'm interested in a response as it is an opinion more than anything else. I have seen these frameworks work well, I just don't really agree with the ideas.
- kevinastone 14y agoThanks, I wanted that little expansion about the concerns about Angular's markup. I, in fact, think quite the opposite and appreciate(d) both Knockout and AngularJS's data binding models to make it much easier to create more interactive web apps without the usual boilerplate of DOM manipulation (or other scaffolding) required in other frameworks.