2 ms·

I was referring to articles on msm like the ones from the WSJ. Anything that goes there is a carefully choreographed dance between the journalist and the PR rep

I was referring to articles on msm like the ones from the WSJ. Anything that goes there is a carefully choreographed dance between the journalist and the PR rep and a lot of questions end up on the cutting floor. Spending time explaining why this and why that is only done for a reason. If they are irrelevant there will be other talking points. Again as someone said below I made a very specific prediction in a verifiable timeframe. We'll see. I was not trying to be a genius but since I believe Valve will be acquired wanted to make a post about it.

skore 14y ago
> Anything that goes there is a carefully choreographed dance between the journalist and the PR rep You mean the PR rep that Valve is quite proud of not having? How about instead of busyworking the numbers to death, just listen to Gabe for an hour or so? There are plenty of talks/interviews of him to go around. If that doesn't give you a rather unmistakable impression of what he is up to then you have a calibration error. Maybe instead of talking msm, m&a, sales, profits and billions, try honing your human modules a little more. If Mr. Newell sells out to Microsoft, he's an idiot. From what I can tell, he is very much not an idiot. How's that for an analysis?