3 ms·
Everson did manage to get J.R.R. Tolkien's Cirth and Tengwar tentatively included; see http://www.unicode.org/roadmaps/smp/ http://www.unicode.org/roadmaps/smp/
by simonster 14y ago
Everson did manage to get J.R.R. Tolkien's Cirth and Tengwar tentatively included; see http://www.unicode.org/roadmaps/smp/ http://www.unicode.org/roadmaps/smp/
- dbaupp 14y agoInteresting! (The proposals themselves, for anyone else interested: http://std.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC2/WG2/docs/n1641/n1641.htm http://std.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC2/WG2/docs/n1641/n1641.htm, http://std.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC2/WG2/docs/n1642/n1642.htm http://std.dkuug.dk/JTC1/SC2/WG2/docs/n1642/n1642.htm)
- lifthrasiir 14y agoNo. The roadmap indicates that they are formally proposed for inclusion and yet to be accepted (and nor rejected either, as in [1]). From the bottom of the roadmap: > (Text between parentheses) indicates scripts for which proposals have been formally submitted to the UTC or to WG2. There is generally a link to the formal proposal. [1] http://www.unicode.org/roadmaps/not-the-roadmap/ http://www.unicode.org/roadmaps/not-the-roadmap/
- simonster 14y agoAccording to the phrasing on the bottom of the page I linked to, the blocks are "tentatively allocated." I'm not sure how this is substantially different from the phrasing I used, which was "tentatively included."