4 ms·
War, in the traditional sense, used to be easier to define. A bunch of people with weapons, pointing them at each other and pulling triggers (as well as the co
by amirmc 14y ago
War, in the traditional sense, used to be easier to define. A bunch of people with weapons, pointing them at each other and pulling triggers (as well as the command-structure and supply chains that support them). Defining when you're at war was easier.
Nowadays, people push buttons from great distances away and one keystroke could unleash havoc halfway around the world. Meanwhile the guy who pushed that button is off to pick up his kids from school (he may not even have known what he started since his code is one piece of a larger whole). At what point are you at war in that scenario? When can the guy who pushed the button be considered an aggressor? While he's behind the keyboard or at anytime during his life thereafter? If he's already part of his country's military, I guess this is different.
I suspect there's a lot of exaggeration in the headline and the actual document is more nuanced.
- bobwaycott 14y ago> I suspect there's a lot of exaggeration in the headline and the actual document is more nuanced. Indeed.
- pekk 14y agoIf it was so easy to define war, then when did the US Civil War begin? We are already in an era after the atomic bomb, after "total war". Now we are disturbed that in the future, civilians might be killed along with the countries they support in war? How about this happening constantly in war all the way back to city-states?
- walshemj 14y agoexactly there are death camps as far back as classical greece as any one who has read Thucydides will know.