3 ms·
This looks surprisingly cool. I've seen plenty of startups claiming to "fix" email, but this is certainly a novel approach. I'm sure that $20 a month won't suit
by toast76 14y ago
This looks surprisingly cool. I've seen plenty of startups claiming to "fix" email, but this is certainly a novel approach. I'm sure that $20 a month won't suit everyone, but if you get hundreds of emails a day and it saves you half an hour a month, it seems worth it.
- bart_zeromail 14y agoThanks! According to a recent McKinsey report says that workers spent 28% of their time on reading and responding to email. Radicati reports that corporate email workers send/receive 105 emails/day. ZeroMail doesn't only save time, but also reduces decision fatigue (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decision_fatigue http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decision_fatigue http://lifehacker.com/5944198/president-obamas-productivity-tacticshttp://lifehacker.com/5944198/president-obamas-productivity-tactics http://lifehacker.com/5944198/president-obamas-productivity-...). Sorting out your own inbox seems like a quick task, but if you respond as the emails come in (which 70% of people do) and 30 emails are just notifications, newsletters or spam, you actually waste over 30 minutes of time in context switching per day. (http://www.drthomasjackson.com/email_comm.html http://www.drthomasjackson.com/email_comm.html) That equals 10 hours per month. How much is your time worth? :)