3 ms·
Honestly, I'm not sure if your counter argument is intended to be ironic. I'm used to an Internet where you're not required to be so goddamned polite. Seems t
by Helianthus 14y ago
Honestly, I'm not sure if your counter argument is intended to be ironic.
I'm used to an Internet where you're not required to be so goddamned polite. Seems to me it becomes the spidery veneer of Silicon Valley networking; insincere, self-interested, and a corruption of what it means to be 'nice.'
- mindcrime 14y agoWhat's wrong with being polite? It doesn't cost any extra and there are a lot of people who appreciate it.
- Helianthus 14y agoNot anything wrong with being polite. Plenty wrong with requiring people to be polite.
- cpeterso 14y agoYou're not required to be polite, but you may be downvoted.
- Helianthus 14y agoshrug yep. I'm saying more that there can be an atmosphere of required politeness. I mean, look; the OP asked a really good, terse question and got downvoted presumably because it was 'rude.' That's just silly.
- 18pfsmt 14y agoI'm curious how the GP's question can be construed as "good" when there exists a blog post that explicitly addresses it. This indicates the GP didn't do even cursory research to determine the answer for themselves. In other words, the GP was lazy, expecting to be hand-fed, and was down-voted as a result.
- freshhawk 14y agoAh! If he was downvoted for asking an easily google-able question then that's reasonable and end of discussion. The discussion here started because of the statement that he was probably downvoted because "how is this different from X?" is interpreted as "This is stupid, we already have X."