3 ms·
True, although it gets annoying having to "rename" a package like this. If it's a package you use everywhere in your project, it gets old fast; canonical, autho
by lobster_johnson 14y ago
True, although it gets annoying having to "rename" a package like this. If it's a package you use everywhere in your project, it gets old fast; canonical, author-defined names are always the best option.
- grey-area 14y agoYes, it could be a pain unless it was just imported in one or two files. In practice though I've not found collisions in package names to be an issue, simply because of the layering of packages - the top level package is really the only one which knows about these adapters and imports them - it then presents an interface to the world which is under its namespace, so the only worry for uniqueness is the top level pkg name really.