4 ms·
SCOTUS: Drug Dogs Require Warrant
- squozzer 14y agoMaybe God exists. When Scalia rules against the police, it's time for a drink, or whatever.
- Turing_Machine 14y agoScalia "rules against the police" quite regularly. Employment Division v. Smith Kyllo v. U.S. Jardines v. Florida Apprendi v. New Jersey Arizona v. Hicks Hamdi v. Rumsfeld (he was in dissent on that one, on the "against the police" side). Numerous others.
- danielweber 14y ago1. At least there is some restriction placed on drug dogs. 2. Why is this on HN?
- OGinparadise 14y agoThe scariest part...5-4. Scalia has his own convictions and sometimes he's a civil libertarian's best friend. Most of the time though...