3 ms·
Rejecting more people is not the same as being more rigorous. They can be the same if your rejection criteria are well-chosen, but I don't have much faith in "t
by lmkg 14y ago
Rejecting more people is not the same as being more rigorous. They can be the same if your rejection criteria are well-chosen, but I don't have much faith in "the CEO glances at your resume." For all the problems that Yahoo! may have with recruiting talent, I have a hard time believing they can be solved by any filter process whose sole input is resumes.
- drstewart 14y agoGoogle used the same policy, and somehow I don't think you would make the same argument about them: >Yet, after five peer interviews, a candidate is still vetted by hiring committees, and Larry Page must approve every hire. Source: http://www.csmonitor.com/Books/Book-Reviews/2012/0124/Are-You-Smart-Enough-to-Work-at-Google http://www.csmonitor.com/Books/Book-Reviews/2012/0124/Are-Yo...