4 ms·
"The solution is not more government nanny-state ideas" "requiring every person who receives 10% or more...to attend classes" This seems like a bit of a non-s
by lhc- 14y ago
"The solution is not more government nanny-state ideas"
"requiring every person who receives 10% or more...to attend classes"
This seems like a bit of a non-sequitur. Don't provide an easy (and free) way for people to submit their taxes without going to a CPA, but do force people to go to some classes? How is that less of a "nanny state"?
- frogpelt 14y agoI admit it sounds contradictory. I guess I equate a nanny-state to the government taking care of something FOR you so you don't have to worry about it. To me, a required educational course about taxes and personal finance would be akin to a driving course--not so much absolving you of responsibility as preparing you to accept it.