> For example, it may be indirect discrimination against a young person to impose a requirement for employees to have held a driving licence for 10 years I un

> For example, it may be indirect discrimination against a young person to impose a requirement for employees to have held a driving licence for 10 years I understand this to be because it is legally only possible for a person to have obtained their license at the age of 18 (or 16 depending on where you're from). I don't think this would apply to "experience in LANGUAGE" at all as, technically, a young person could have that experience from a very young age. From the excerpt you've quoted, I don't think specifying years experience in a language would be against the law.