3 ms·
"What we have now is the best, because everything gets better all the time. Therefore old technology is not interesting." Not so sure we do (non-expert here).
by keithpeter 14y ago
"What we have now is the best, because everything gets better all the time. Therefore old technology is not interesting."
Not so sure we do (non-expert here). I suspect certain choices were made in the past, often as a result of hardware limitations, which have now become too hard to change.
The only examples I can come up with right now are music related; midi encoding implies a discrete pitch class system with semitone spacing. Work-rounds are needed for micro-pitches. CD format reflects the limitations of video tape in the early digital recording era.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/44,100_Hz http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/44,100_Hz
http://support.ircam.fr/docs/om/om6-manual/co/Microintervals.html http://support.ircam.fr/docs/om/om6-manual/co/Microintervals...
- rbanffy 14y ago> I suspect certain choices were made in the past, often as a result of hardware limitations, which have now become too hard to change. Save that into C:\AMEM.TXT!