2 ms·
The most nonsensical part of all of this seems to be that Yahoo's going to kill the app and just integrate the technology into it's own products. As far as I c
by jordn 14y ago
The most nonsensical part of all of this seems to be that Yahoo's going to kill the app and just integrate the technology into it's own products.
As far as I can tell, the reason the app was so valuable was due to the story that came with it, not the technology. Two years ago it got it got national coverage due to the surprisingly young age of the founder managing to create a popular app and raise funding. At the time the summarisation technology was highly unsophisticated. It appears that's now improved by using a combination of machine learning and natural language processing but I'm yet to hear a strong case that this tech is particularly innovative or protected from being reproduced elsewhere.
By killing the app, they're losing all the users up to this point and all the potential customers that would check it out after hearing this story. These people don't particular care for the summarisation algorithm, they're not going to be searching for yahoo's own version of the app in a months time.
Yahoo's either being stupid or know something we don't.
- sliverstorm 14y agoYou think all his users are using his app because he's young? I think that is unrealistic; they use it because it provides value. Yahoo! just wants to incorporate that value into their own offerings. How is this surprising? To make something great, you have to bring lots of good things together.
- jordn 14y agoNo, I think they started using it because they heard of it (because he is young) and then stuck with it because it provides value. Whether that value is strong enough to essentially start again with a whole new app is debatable.