Thanks Dan - didn't see that in the article, but if that's really the return on capital, its a significant one. I'd poke a little bit more as to what the real o

Thanks Dan - didn't see that in the article, but if that's really the return on capital, its a significant one. I'd poke a little bit more as to what the real opportunity cost was here (ie, did you absolutely need to spend the $2.2M to get the fuel savings, or could a more efficient system of checking them with cheap transmitting devices work), but that's context that should have been in the main article.