4 ms·
Doesn't appear to be doing anything for me, noasm 285 asm 13 asm 13 noasm 269 That's all that appears in the console. Network and everything
by simcop2387 14y ago
Doesn't appear to be doing anything for me,
noasm 285
asm 13
asm 13
noasm 269
That's all that appears in the console. Network and everything looks fine, no 404 or other errors.
- abecedarius 14y agoYes, I disabled display so that wouldn't get into the benchmark. The numbers are times in milliseconds.
- Groxx 14y agoI wonder if most / all of that speedup is just using typed arrays (edit: nvm, they both do). I get similar speeds in Chrome, which afaik doesn't have any special handling for `"use asm";` functions.
- srijs 14y agoTyped arrays do deliver a lot of speedup, and in fact, the above example is slightly faster in Chrome than in Firefox Nightly for me. However, if your algorithm does crunch a lot of data in a low-level way, there is definitely even more performance you can get by using asm.js. See my link in the comment below for benchmarks of a sha1 algorithm that shows a good speedup in Chrome by using TypedArrays, but an even greater one in OdinMonkey.
- Groxx 14y agoawesome - thanks for doing the legwork! I'll definitely take a look.