3 ms·
I feel like > There are plenty of scientific reasons why skyscrapers don’t—and probably won’t—have trees, at least not to the heights which many architects pro
by ryanklee 14y ago
I feel like
> There are plenty of scientific reasons why skyscrapers don’t—and probably won’t—have trees, at least not to the heights which many architects propose.
implies strongly and clearly enough that the author doesn't think it's feasible.
That said, he's also clearly annoyed that designers/architects are being unrealistic in their proposals.
- josefresco 14y agoMaybe it's more me wishing he had taken that tact than him actually doing so. I felt like he should be more mad at the architects and those who award projects to said architects with these "never to be implemented" features.