4 ms·
If you think the first book is a masterpiece, don't read anymore in the series. It will ruin it for you. :) I "like" some of the later ones, but none are as w
by jeremymcanally 14y ago
If you think the first book is a masterpiece, don't read anymore in the series. It will ruin it for you. :) I "like" some of the later ones, but none are as well-written, impeccably paced, or engaging as the first in my opinion.
I don't doubt we'll see some adaptation of the story for film, but at its core, I think it should hold up fairly well. Let's just hope we don't end up with Bean being a Jar Jar Binks character or something stupid like that.
- jagermo 14y agoI agree. Ender's Shadow (the story of Bean) is also ok, but Card gets a little to deep into religion for my taste.
- moogleii 14y agoI've found that seems to happen with most novel series. I guess they suffer just as movie sequels do. From my experience, on average, quality is maintained for the first two books, and then it starts to nosedive.
- harryh 14y agoFWIW Speaker For The Dead also won both the Hugo & Nebula awards. It's fairly different from Ender's Game, so I can see why some folks might not like it but I thought it was pretty good. It's worth checking out at least.
- hfs 14y agoIs Children of the Mind any good? I was kind of put off by how Xenocide ended.
- RyanMcGreal 14y agoThe series does tend to follow the law of diminishing returns. Speaker For The Dead feels more mature and literary, but was less fun to read. Xenocide and Children of the Mind, in turn, are scarcely worth getting through, and the payoff at the end isn't worth the suspension of disbelief or, indeed, the trouble.
- vectorpush 14y agoIMO, Speaker For The Dead is the true masterpiece and Ender's Game is simply a necessary bit of back-history to setup events for the Speaker story to be told.
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]