2 ms·
Hi, I tried a search for "model based testing" and the results seem not to be of very high quality. Are you lacking sources? Also, it's not possible to discern
by tinco 14y ago
Hi, I tried a search for "model based testing" and the results seem not to be of very high quality. Are you lacking sources?
Also, it's not possible to discern high-quality from low-quality papers in any way. As a graduate student, I weed out what I should read by reading the titles+abstracts in the order of the amount of citations. Citation amount maybe isn't the most optimal indicator of quality but it is a strong one.
In order of importance: Scope (does it cover all journals?), Quality (how do I know if something's worth reading), Speed (I noticed your search runs a little on the slow side).
Other than that the site looks great, I'd certainly switch if you would get the basics down :)
- mhluongo 14y agoHm, right now we've got the same coverage as CiteSeerX (where most of our data comes from), and are working on expanding. What sources do you particularly think are lacking? We've talked quite a bit internally about whether to include citations counts. It's a tough call, but until we're happier with our scoring it might make sense to help bolster result reputation. Thanks for the feedback!
- tinco 14y agoHey no problem :) I'm just a student so I'm not researching a particular field at the moment, the Model Based Testing paper I was looking for I had to read for a course. I just wouldn't use your site as long as I feel _any_ journal is missing, since google does not give me that feeling.