4 ms·
It's in Spolsky's interests to hire people who "could" manage multiple projects if given that responsibility I'm not sure that's true. I've never been a proje
by sethg 18y ago
It's in Spolsky's interests to hire people who "could" manage multiple projects if given that responsibility
I'm not sure that's true.
I've never been a project manager, but I have had a job where I would sit idle for weeks at a time because nobody had anything for me to work on. I eventually quit.
So I would expect that someone who could manage multiple projects at Fog Creek, but is only managing one, would not be happy there, either, even if he/she were paid as much as the people who actually were managing multiple projects.
And, yes it's good for there to be a buffer of talent, but that buffer would ideally be spread across the whole company--every person who is managing one project should be able to manage one project and contribute to another--not concentrated in a few stars.
- tptacek 18y agoIf every person in the company can manage a project, then Spolsky's formula is artificially restraining compensation for the majority of his employees, and the selection of who gets to lead FogBugz and Copilot and Project Antelope or whatever is simply a proxy for the same subjective political BS that happens in every salary negotiation. Which is kind of my point. Again: no doubt at all this system works for Fog Creek. But it was written up in Inc. because someone believes it could work elsewhere. Not so sure about that.