5 ms·
I would much rather see Bill Gates offer $100,000 to developing a cheap and easily reversible vasectomy, and disrupt the condom market.
by gee_totes 14y ago
I would much rather see Bill Gates offer $100,000 to developing a cheap and easily reversible vasectomy, and disrupt the condom market.
- raverbashing 14y agoVasectomy does nothing for venereal diseases. Ok, it may reduce the transmission of some diseases, but not to a safe level. But I remember there was something like 'easy and cheap' vasectomy (still in research) being done by injecting polymers in the Vas Deferens Ok, found the wikipedia for it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reversible_inhibition_of_sperm_under_guidance http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reversible_inhibition_of_sperm_...
- gee_totes 14y agoAgreed, but I think the main reason for people using condoms is to reduce pregnancy. The STD prevention is just a value-add (or at least that's what the Neurosyphilis voices in my head are telling me)
- nilkn 14y agoOnce you have a steady, trustworthy partner, condoms are mostly used just to prevent pregnancy. So a cheap and easily reversible vasectomy wouldn't eliminate the condom market, but it would certainly disrupt it I would think.
- nicholassmith 14y agoI would assume they're focused on STIs, HIV and AIDS rather than decreasing pregnancy rates. Whilst vasectomy reversal would disrupt condoms, male anti-birth pills (getting ever closer to production) are more likely to achieve what you're thinking.
- pervycreeper 14y agoI think that was a joke
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]
- biot 14y agoAnd/or bring DRACO to market: http://www.ll.mit.edu/news/DRACO.html http://www.ll.mit.edu/news/DRACO.html
- kirk21 14y agoSome products are being tested. http://www.wired.com/magazine/2011/04/ff_vasectomy/1 http://www.wired.com/magazine/2011/04/ff_vasectomy/1