Thanks for the quick response. I think, though, that my suggestion was a bad one. It seems you should select the highest rated thread for a a link with mutlit

Thanks for the quick response. I think, though, that my suggestion was a bad one. It seems you should select the highest rated thread for a a link with mutlitple submissions. For instance, this article shows the more recent thread with little/no comments, while there's a great set of comments I'd prefer to see listed with it: http://www.forbes.com/sites/morganhartley/2013/03/19/how-a-y-combinator-startup-is-born-the-story-of-strikingly/ http://www.forbes.com/sites/morganhartley/2013/03/19/how-a-y... Good comments: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5402301 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5402301 No Comments: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5400599 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5400599 Both stories submitted 4 days ago. This use case seems more common than the google.com one. It's possible you'd want to treat bare domains differently, or treat top web sites differently, etc. Depends on how much work you'd like to put into this project. I for one will keep using it if you keep working on it :)