3 ms·
Perhaps, but when useful features see lack of use, it's usually because it's a prohibitively difficult feature to use or very poorly presented. Maybe if it was
by just2n 14y ago
Perhaps, but when useful features see lack of use, it's usually because it's a prohibitively difficult feature to use or very poorly presented.
Maybe if it was as simple as clicking a "never see results from this website again" it would've seen orders of magnitude more use and been far more useful. Perhaps an upvote/downvote system? Seems like these are relatively tiny time investments by a couple of engineers and would serve to massively increase the quality of results. Not sure why throwing useful features away is a better decision.