4 ms·

Yes, but not all animals eat one another. And we are not, like tigers and lions, obligate carnivores. We can survive and thrive without meat. Our bodies are cap

• Goronmon 14y ago
  If you don't need to kill/keep captive animals for food to live healthily, why do it? Because it tastes good. Just like every other type of food we eat that isn't a requirement for living healthily.
  • mlent 14y ago
    I agree that it's the only actual "reason." I just don't think it's a good reason. I think it presumes that the value of "taste" for us is greater than the value of "life" to an animal. And there's a lot of evidence that most meat is very unhealthy for you, anyways. As an interesting (perhaps?) side note, I tasted meat recently for the first time in 2+ years and it was really lame and underwhelming. :/
    • jlgreco 14y ago
      > I tasted meat recently for the first time in 2+ years and it was really lame and underwhelming. That statement is about as bizarre as "I tasted alcohol once, I don't understand what the big deal is".
      • mlent 14y ago
        I don't think it's the same at all. I don't think it requires a history of meat-eating in order to determine whether or not something tastes good to you or not. I tried steak, chicken, and fish. I don't think that most people would call meat "an acquired taste"? My personal theory is that vegans put in way more effort to make their food taste good than non-vegans, and we eat an extremely wide variety of foods, so eating things like "steak" or "chicken" is generally a very boring flavor experience. I had a bite of "good steak" and thought...this is alright, but I could make better-tasting seitan!
        • jlgreco 14y ago
          > "I tried steak, chicken, and fish" That does not seem much better. You may as well say "I don't like alcohol, I tried 'good beer', wine, and liquor". There are particular animals that I like or do not like (salmon for instance I have never been a fan of with any preparation I have tried) and various preparations/cuts that I do not like (lamb chops, most preparations of steak besides rare (preferably Pittsburgh rare, which is sadly difficult to find or prepare yourself at home) and most baked/broiled preparations of poultry). These classifications are again only scratching the surface of course, basically just breaking the question down to "ale or lager? white wine or red? Dark liquor, or clear?" Regardless if it isn't your thing, then knock yourself out, but you should be sure that you don't fall into the trap of being confused why others don't share your personal preferences. (Or worse, trying to suggest that people who don't share your personal preferences are deluding themselves; lying to themselves about their own tastes.) I don't find myself annoyed by veganism/vegetariansim until I really get one of those vibes coming across.
          • mlent 14y ago
            Yeah, I just tasted it because I'd forgotten what it tasted like. Obviously taste isn't a reason to stop eating meat for everyone, and it's certainly not as compelling as animal welfare/personal health/environmental concerns.
      • tene 14y ago
        Hi. I've tried alcohol a couple of times, and I don't understand what the big deal is. Intellectually, sure, I'm aware that it decreases social inhibitions, but it didn't do much of anything for me, and it tasted pretty bad, so I haven't bothered with it any further.
        • lilsunnybee 14y ago
          If it didn't do anything for you, i doubt you drank very much. Most mind-altering substances also taste bad.
    • Draco6slayer 14y ago
      I disagree. There are a lot of nutrients (mostly protein) that, without meat, require us to rely heavily on nuts and beans. A dependency on those requires a large amount of additional effort for the consumer. Nut allergies are intensely common besides, having to depend your entire muscular structure on the number of beans you eat would be both very ineffective and would have a number of negative results. Point being, meat is the most efficient way to get a lot of nutrients, and you can't declare that everyone can't eat it because you may someday discover that it's intelligent. The future is broad, we might find out that plants are actually the intelligent beings on this planet. Does that mean we should all starve ourselves now on the fear that that may happen in the future?
      • mlent 14y ago
        Everything has protein in it. I've gotten over 100g in a day without trying and little to no nuts. Your body will naturally combine different types of amino acids to form complete proteins. You just need to eat a variety of foods and you'll be good to go. The issue with a vegan diet is eating enough calories, not getting enough protein. In fact, many people in the US eat too much protein which is very bad for you! It's easy to undereat accidentally on a vegan diet because you have to physically eat more. Hard to complain about that though. And effort, in my opinion, isn't enough to justify eating animals. Think about the specific efforts you go through to prepare raw chicken: you have to wash your hands in between handling it and your other foods so you don't risk contaminating them with salmonella. Way more effort than my dinner, where everything can safely touch!
      • cameronh90 14y ago
        Getting sufficient nutrients on a vegetarian diet is not difficult. It requires no particular thought unless you're doing a lot of exercise and need a huge amount of protein, but even then, it's pretty easy to get unless you want to avoid eggs, milk, soya, tempeh, nuts, mycoprotein, beans, lentils, protein supplements, etc. Iron is more difficult in theory, but no other vegetarians I know have actually had a problem with it.
        • bwood 14y ago
  • pyre 14y ago
    | Because it tastes good Ah, but in a vacuum of other considerations, I hear that human flesh is very tasty. Would you fancy a go with cannibalism?