12 ms·
Access to mass communication is a basic necessity in any democracy. People have to be able to inform themselves about current political topics if they are to ta
by arrrg 14y ago
Access to mass communication is a basic necessity in any democracy. People have to be able to inform themselves about current political topics if they are to take informed decisions.
As such all that’s needed to access that information is not a luxury item. I agree that nowadays it’s possible to inform oneself equally well if one can access the internet (and a newspaper subscription was always a possible substitute), but I think it would be wrong to privilege certain forms of access to information, not the least because certain forms of accessing information might be harder or easier to use for certain groups of people. Consequently privileging, say, internet access would potentially exclude certain people from the political process.
Mass media plays a central and important role in the democracy of any larger democracy. Its existence is vital and as many people as possible should have access to it.
- ldh 14y agoI think you make an extremely important point. I largely agree with you, yet I don't think it's entirely cynical of me to think that if your primary source of data for making informed decisions is coming from television, you're (and we're all) still probably better off without it.