3 ms·

Nope. https://www.hnsearch.com/search#request/submissions&q=S10+or+W10+or+S11+or+W11+or+S12+or+W12+&start=0 https://www.hnsearch.com/search#request/submissions

• pbreit 14y ago
  Those are all launch-like announcements. Is that what you were trying to show.
  • subsystem 14y ago
    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5335271 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5335271 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2979603 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2979603 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2281694 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2281694 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1491259 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1491259 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5315118 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5315118
    • pbreit 14y ago
      All these are different from a random person tossing in a "what's the problem with [x]?"
      • SilasX 14y ago
        Oh, definitely. Those are all positive news about a YC company. That's why it's totally kosher and no moderator would ever dream of stripping off the association. This article, in contrast, is about a company potentially looting users' bitcoins due a mysteriously long response time and users being unable to withdraw. Obviously mentioning the YC connection is completely inappropriate. We need to remember here, that this site is solely for the celebration of YC companies, not to point out that YC potentially funded a bad apple that's screwing it's customers. Please, use the YC association correctly.