4 ms·
not the case for us, Ruby 1.9.3 outperformed latest JRuby for us. Ruby 2.0 completely smoked it (and with GC tuning and tcmalloc even more), we leverage a fair
by sams99 14y ago
not the case for us, Ruby 1.9.3 outperformed latest JRuby for us. Ruby 2.0 completely smoked it (and with GC tuning and tcmalloc even more), we leverage a fair amount of native gems, like the oj json serializer and fast_xs. Trouble is we would need Java implementations of some key bits of functionality.
Now I love Charlie's work and would port to JRuby in a blink if it was faster. But as it is now, for us, it is not.
- rurounijones 14y agoActually yes I should have mentioned that I hadn't compared ruby2 and jruby, mea culpa.
- abc_lisper 14y agoIdk about you, here's what I found: http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/u32/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=jruby&lang2=yarv http://benchmarksgame.alioth.debian.org/u32/benchmark.php?te...
- sams99 14y agoKeep in mind, the only benchmark I really care about is Discourse itself, I am sure that in many micro benchmarks JRuby is faster and/or slower
- deleted 14y ago[deleted]