3 ms·

>Is this a troll? Wow. After reading both of your contributions to this thread you stand our far more as the troll to my eyes. >What sexist assumptions is wh

>Is this a troll? Wow. After reading both of your contributions to this thread you stand our far more as the troll to my eyes. >What sexist assumptions is white-collar Work [sic] culture based on? Are you seriously saying "white-collar work culture" isn't sexist? Pop quiz: how many female CEOs are there in the fortune 100? If you're guess was closer to 8 (the actual number) than 50 would you mind explaining why you would guess that? >The calculated harnessing of risk. You're talking about over all risk, he was talking about personal risk of which trading has very little compared to other career options. >Take advantage HOW? Must one recount the total sum of all knowledge in every post for you? It's pretty well established how and why tech people are exploited. If you haven't been keeping up then that's your responsibility to educate yourself. Not every poster from now until the sun burns out to keep reiterating our collective accumulated knowledge and experience.

obstacle1 14y ago
>Pop quiz: how many female CEOs are there in the fortune 100? If you're guess was closer to 8 (the actual number) than 50 would you mind explaining why you would guess that? You know what's sexist? Assuming that a certain demographic makeup for a role in an industry is makes the culture sexist. The fact that 8% of F100 CEOs are male doesn't indicate sexism without further evidence, just like the fact that only 5% of nurses are male[1] doesn't indicate sexism without further evidence. Where is your further evidence? And BTW, it's "your", not "you're". > It's pretty well established how and why tech people are exploited No it isn't. Nobody even agrees on what constitutes exploitation. I'm not satisfied with the intellectual laziness you're advocating for, sorry. [1] - http://www.minoritynurse.com/minority-nursing-statistics http://www.minoritynurse.com/minority-nursing-statistics

obstacle1 14y ago

>Pop quiz: how many female CEOs are there in the fortune 100? If you're guess was closer to 8 (the actual number) than 50 would you mind explaining why you would guess that? You know what's sexist? Assuming that a certain demographic makeup for a role in an industry is makes the culture sexist. The fact that 8% of F100 CEOs are male doesn't indicate sexism without further evidence, just like the fact that only 5% of nurses are male[1] doesn't indicate sexism without further evidence. Where is your further evidence? And BTW, it's "your", not "you're". > It's pretty well established how and why tech people are exploited No it isn't. Nobody even agrees on what constitutes exploitation. I'm not satisfied with the intellectual laziness you're advocating for, sorry. [1] - http://www.minoritynurse.com/minority-nursing-statistics http://www.minoritynurse.com/minority-nursing-statistics