3 ms·
> There's been plenty of humor by cruel people perpetrating injustices. They thought it was genuinely funny at the time. Yes. Exactly. And there is no hard-and
by derleth 14y ago
> There's been plenty of humor by cruel people perpetrating injustices. They thought it was genuinely funny at the time.
Yes. Exactly. And there is no hard-and-fast rule to determine what kind of humor perpetrates injustices, because, frankly, it is up to every single individual who hears the joke. And that's scary, especially when people think that normal socializing behaviors can all of a sudden get them fired and nobody's told them what the new rules are. Because, as I said, there really are no new rules.
So use an old rule: Common courtesy. Giving people the benefit of the doubt. Treating other people as stupid human beings. Yes, "stupid". More offense is caused by stupidity than actual malice.
Of course, if you find that the other person really is being malicious, knock them down with a righteous wrath and tell us all about it afterwards.
- stcredzero 14y ago> So use an old rule: Common courtesy. Giving people the benefit of the doubt. Treating other people as stupid human beings. Yes, "stupid". More offense is caused by stupidity than actual malice. Well said. > Of course, if you find that the other person really is being malicious, knock them down with a righteous wrath and tell us all about it afterwards. I find there's more hate and malice than ever before nowadays. It's also more self-righteous than it was before too. It's like the Internet is the Babelfish from the Hitchikers series, causing more acrimony than ever before, now that we have fuller access to what everyone else thinks.