3 ms·
First, because it demonstrates the extent to which a company can be brought to its knees by a group of hostile people organized online I agree. This is frighte
by danielweber 14y ago
First, because it demonstrates the extent to which a company can be brought to its knees by a group of hostile people organized online
I agree. This is frightening. Any concept of a DDOS being a "digital sit-in" are dumb. PlayHaven may also have been trying to avoid the mob, too.
Second because hundreds and hundreds of men here and elsewhere seem quite happy to align themselves with an overtly sexist, violently threatening campaign against an individual whose views they disagree with.
What do you mean by "align themselves"? Those are extremely vague words.
Do you mean "approve of"? Or do you mean "takes the same side as"?
Anyone who approves of the DDOS is a moron. Anyone who approves of death threats is a sociopath. The people who issued threats should be subject to criminal prosecution.
However, people can find themselves legitimately on the same side of an issue as a bunch of assholes. No one should be forced out of a position by the fact that disgusting people also have that opinion.[1]
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_fallacy http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_fallacy
- thejosh 14y agoDDOS is about the same level as fire bombing a business. People like Richard Stallman who disagree (Richard Stallman is stuck in the past) really haven't got a clue that's going on.
- dinkumthinkum 14y agoNo, I can't make that leap. Firebombing? I don't condone DDOS, but that's just crazy. The moment people can die (without citing some kind of really strange examples) from DDOS, I will reconsider but come on.
- hga 14y agoArson is a serious felony because people are often killed by it, inhabitants and/or firefighters. A DDoS is akin to blocking the entry of customers to a retail establishment.