3 ms·
I do not disagree with you that the statement also named that as a reason for firing her. All I’m saying that if the DDoS played any part in their decision to
by arrrg 14y ago
I do not disagree with you that the statement also named that as a reason for firing her.
All I’m saying that if the DDoS played any part in their decision to fire her, then that part of the justification for their decision represents immoral cowardice to me.
- Yver 14y agonamed that? Which part? I think you're perceiving things that are not there.
- arrrg 14y agoI quoted the segment where I think the statement makes reference to the DDoS. It is open to interpretation, but I don’t think it’s an unreasonable interpretation.
- alan_cx 14y agoThe bit you quoted makes no reference to the DDoS. You decided that the quoted text implied that. You then talk about interpretation, having claimed a specific reference that doesn't exist.
- alan_cx 14y agoThe bit you quoted makes no reference to the DDoS. You decided that the quoted text implied that. You then talk about interpretation, having claimed a specific reference that doesn't exist. You can't have it both ways.