3 ms·
"They could have paid for his PyCon expenses (therefore he was there representing the company), and they felt that he did a poor job representing the company."
by niggler 14y ago
"They could have paid for his PyCon expenses (therefore he was there representing the company), and they felt that he did a poor job representing the company."
Doesn't explain why one person is still an employee while the other gentleman was canned.
"It's possible there were other reasons they wanted to fire him before PyCon, but this became a good excuse to act on them."
I strongly suspect this happened, given the comment in the PlayHaven response: "we will not comment on all the factors that contributed to our parting ways."
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5418123 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5418123
EDIT: clarifying that one person was not fired.
- Semaphor 14y ago> Doesn't explain why the other gentleman was canned. Which other gentleman got canned?
- niggler 14y agoPoorly worded. One person, identified as "Andy Reid", was not fired but the other person was. Editing parent to reflect the clarification
- cheapsteak 14y agoMaybe they decided to only fire the person who made the joke? It would hardly seem fair to fire the other guy if all he did was listen