3 ms·
The same one she sent this joke about sexual humiliation from: https://twitter.com/adriarichards/status/312265091791847425 https://twitter.com/adriarichards/st
by WalterSear 14y ago
The same one she sent this joke about sexual humiliation from:
https://twitter.com/adriarichards/status/312265091791847425 https://twitter.com/adriarichards/status/312265091791847425
And the company she was envangelising for on that twitter feed thinks that a visual joke about photocopying your genitals is not inappropriate for their jobs pages:
http://i.imgur.com/uWc8P39.png http://i.imgur.com/uWc8P39.png
I understand that speaker and context make all the difference, but she made a joke about sexual humiliation, and then, at the same conference, got offended by a joke comparing dongles to genitals.
- niggler 14y agoI was responding to "Her role is to speak for the company" But yes, you do point out something strange about her tweets. Unfortunately, many people approach this issue with a double standard
- WalterSear 14y agoShe was using her personal twitter account as an extension of her job, which does make her comments 'speaking for the company'. It's part of the role of a tech evangelist. If she was not comfortable with this, she should have maintained a greater separation between her professional and personal online behaviour.