3 ms·
Thanks for the quick fix. The extension is pretty useful. One thing I'd say is to default to the most recent thread for common sites like google.com. There are
by eah13 14y ago
Thanks for the quick fix. The extension is pretty useful.
One thing I'd say is to default to the most recent thread for common sites like google.com. There are often rando 300 day old threads that show up for them.
- pak 14y agoIt's easy enough to sort by create_ts; updated again! The most recent thread for google.com is still pretty old. I'm kind of surprised that these multiple threads don't get automerged when the second and following people try to resubmit.
- eah13 14y agoThanks for the quick response. I think, though, that my suggestion was a bad one. It seems you should select the highest rated thread for a a link with mutlitple submissions. For instance, this article shows the more recent thread with little/no comments, while there's a great set of comments I'd prefer to see listed with it: http://www.forbes.com/sites/morganhartley/2013/03/19/how-a-y-combinator-startup-is-born-the-story-of-strikingly/ http://www.forbes.com/sites/morganhartley/2013/03/19/how-a-y... Good comments: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5402301 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5402301 No Comments: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5400599 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5400599 Both stories submitted 4 days ago. This use case seems more common than the google.com one. It's possible you'd want to treat bare domains differently, or treat top web sites differently, etc. Depends on how much work you'd like to put into this project. I for one will keep using it if you keep working on it :)