4 ms·
This is a good point, and unfortunately it means that most of the advantage of using _.defaults() goes by the wayside. It just becomes a matter of personal pref
by STRML 14y ago
This is a good point, and unfortunately it means that most of the advantage of using _.defaults() goes by the wayside. It just becomes a matter of personal preference. Thanks for the tip.
- masklinn 14y ago> This is a good point, and unfortunately it means that most of the advantage of using _.defaults() goes by the wayside. How and why? I don't consider mutating the original object to be an advantage of using _.defaults, unless the object is completely under your control and you're essentially calling `_.defaults(this, defaults)`.