4 ms·
Perhaps irrelevant counterexamples: >Since when did it become ok to vilify someone for a private conversation? * Having a private conversation during a movie
by EthanHeilman 14y ago
Perhaps irrelevant counterexamples:
>Since when did it become ok to vilify someone for a private conversation?
* Having a private conversation during a movie or play is generally considered the action of the worse sort of villain.
* Plenty of people have been vilified and sent to jail on the basis of statements made privately.
* Just because something is private doesn't mean it isn't disruptive to people within earshot.
>A private conversation in a public area is still private.
* You don't generate a cone of silence by addressing a statement to a particular person. It is likely that people around you can still hear you.
* Furthermore in a public venue you have no expectation of privacy.
- bad_user 14y ago> Just because something is private doesn't mean it isn't disruptive to people within earshot Just because something is disrupting people's ears, that doesn't mean it shouldn't happen. Ultimately it becomes a freedom of speech issue. The joke wasn't sexist. Sexist jokes offend me too. But am I supposed to stop making sexual jokes now because somebody around me might get offended? Sorry, but fuck off and don't listen if you're a sensitive bitch.
- LockeWatts 14y ago>* You don't generate a cone of silence by addressing a statement to a particular person. It is likely that people around you can still hear you. And... so what? If I walk through a cafeteria and someone says something I don't like while chatting with their friends, I have the right to get them fired over it? I don't understand how people are advocating that.