The distinction is whether or not there is an audience. If people believe that it is anonymous, then it is the voice of anonymous. Getting the internet mad abo

The distinction is whether or not there is an audience. If people believe that it is anonymous, then it is the voice of anonymous. Getting the internet mad about the statement is what fuels them to put words into actions, which is why they're best to ignore. They may have a unified voice for large campaigns, but for smaller shit like this it's just a random person volunteering a press release.