You walk on a very thin rope here. I don't at all buy the 'slight misunderstanding' thing concerning the case they had. The damage to 37signals image could hav

You walk on a very thin rope here. I don't at all buy the 'slight misunderstanding' thing concerning the case they had. The damage to 37signals image could have been very real. Even if it wasn't done purposedly. What is more important is, i don't get why you see 37signals as the porentially harmful actor here. If i had a startup i would be very happy that 37signals did the job to stop this company to potentially harm My work too ! Also the argument that this public response is gonna 'harm' getsatisfaction in anyway doesn't hold up at all. At the very worse, this is bad publicity, and if they're smart they can still turn that around easily.