> Comparing her to a reporter is disingenuous. Actually, I intended that comparison sincerely; it was not disingenuous. > That's hardly a fair and balanced pi

> Comparing her to a reporter is disingenuous. Actually, I intended that comparison sincerely; it was not disingenuous. > That's hardly a fair and balanced piece she has written. Not all reporting is balanced. If it were INACCURATE, you would have a point, but presenting one side of the story is still journalism. > if my newspaper started behaving like the Sexual Temperance Society, I would promptly cancel my subscription. I would encourage you to unsubscribe to Adria's blog and twitter. Much like any crank with a printing press, she has absolutely no power, except that a large number of people happen to listen to her. If fewer people listen, then her ability to affect others goes down proportionately. There are many newspapers that print a highly one-sided and slanted view of the news focused heavily on scandals (The Sun, New York Post, and many others). I do not buy these, but I will defend their right to attend a conference and publish true information about things that a person said in public while there.