The moral aspect of this story is interesting. Had he taken up the offer of a luxury bugged storefront with all the equipment he wanted, he would now be a resp

The moral aspect of this story is interesting. Had he taken up the offer of a luxury bugged storefront with all the equipment he wanted, he would now be a respectable, financially secure citizen instead of languishing for over 24 years in jail. What do such extremely diverse outcomes for the same past activities say about the validity of the law and its implementation process? The only hitch is that his innocent clients who have every right to hide their jewelery and other valuables in their own car would all have their security knowingly compromised by him. What does that tell us about the authorities, their attitude towards our privacy rights, and the moral values they expect and enforce?